Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficient production of 1,2,4-butanetriol from corn cob hydrolysate by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli

Microbial Cell Factories volume 23, Article number: 49 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Corn cob is a major waste mass-produced in corn agriculture. Corn cob hydrolysate containing xylose, arabinose, and glucose is the hydrolysis product of corn cob. Herein, a recombinant Escherichia coli strain BT-10 was constructed to transform corn cob hydrolysate into 1,2,4-butanetriol, a platform substance with diversified applications. To eliminate catabolite repression and enhance NADPH supply for alcohol dehydrogenase YqhD catalyzed 1,2,4-butanetriol generation, ptsG encoding glucose transporter EIICBGlc and pgi encoding phosphoglucose isomerase were deleted. With four heterologous enzymes including xylose dehydrogenase, xylonolactonase, xylonate dehydratase, α-ketoacid decarboxylase and endogenous YqhD, E. coli BT-10 can produce 36.63 g/L 1,2,4-butanetriol with a productivity of 1.14 g/[L·h] using xylose as substrate. When corn cob hydrolysate was used as the substrate, 43.4 g/L 1,2,4-butanetriol was generated with a productivity of 1.09 g/[L·h] and a yield of 0.9 mol/mol. With its desirable characteristics, E. coli BT-10 is a promising strain for commercial 1,2,4-butanetriol production.

Introduction

Corn is one of the most important sources of starch in the world. Corn cob is inevitably and massively generated as a by-product of the corn agriculture. Nowadays, corn cob is either burnt as fuel or treated as a waste causing environmental pollution [1,2]. Corn cob can be hydrolyzed into corn cob hydrolysate (CCH) with xylose, arabinose and glucose [1,2]. Numerous efforts have been made to obtain efficient routes for resource utilization of CCH [3,4,5]. Many value-added chemicals including xylitol, [6] xylonate, [7] and ethanol [8] can be produced from CCH by metabolic engineered microorganisms.

1,2,4-Butanetriol (1,2,4-BT) is a platform chemical with versatile applications [9]. The most important application of 1,2,4-BT is to produce 1,2,4-butanetriol trinitrate (BTTN). BTTN has the advantages of low impact sensitivity, high energy level, high thermal stability, no brittleness at low temperature and high reaction safety, and thus is an excellent substitute for nitroglycerin [10]. In addition, 1,2,4-BT can also be used as the precursor for production of plastic monomers or medicines [11,12]. Currently, 1,2,4-BT is commercially produced through malate reduction with NaBH4 under high temperature and high pressure [13]. Harsh reaction conditions, serious pollutions, and difficult downstream purification process restricted the application of this chemical method [13]. Therefore, microbial 1,2,4-BT synthesis from renewable sources has attracted considerable attentions [14,15,16].

Researchers have designed different unnatural pathways for 1,2,4-BT biosynthesis from xylose, glucose, arabinose or malate [14,15,16]. Niu et al. established the first fermentation process for 1,2,4-BT synthesis using two-step fermentation [17]. Xylose or arabinose, the two major pentoses in CCH, are transformed into 1,2,4-BT through a five-enzyme process [17]. The five successive enzymatic reactions can also be introduced into a recombinant strain to realize 1,2,4-BT production [18,19,20,21,22]. Jing et al. blocked the branching pathway of xylose metabolism, fine-tuned the expression of xylose isomerase in Escherichia coli, screened an efficient 2-keto-3-deoxyxylonate (2-KDX) decarboxylase KivD, and produced 10.03 g/L 1,2,4-BT from xylose in Luria–Bertani medium [19]. Recently, the group of Sutiono reported the enzymatic synthesis of 1,2,4-BT using xylose as the substrate. 1,2,4-BT production with titers beyond 100 g/L can be acquired under the most suitable conditions [23]. CCH is an ideal substrate for fermentative production of 1,2,4-BT. However, glucose in CCH may induce carbon catabolite repression and inhibit the transport and biotransformation of xylose and arabinose [24]. In addition, glucose catabolism through Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway mainly generates NADH but reduction of 3,4-dihydroxybutanal to produce 1,2,4-BT catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase YqhD requires NADPH as the cofactor [25]. Herein, E. coli W3110 (DE3) was systematically metabolic engineered for generation of 1,2,4-BT from CCH. Briefly, the key genes for production of 1,2,4-BT were overexpressed while the competing pathways related to xylose catabolism were blocked. The ptsG encoding the glucose-specific transporter EIICBGlc was knocked out to eliminate carbon catabolite repression and enhance xylose utilization. The pgi encoding glucose-6-phosphate isomerase PGI in EMP pathway was deleted to strengthen pentose phosphate pathway and NADPH supply (Fig. 1). Finally, the production of 1,2,4-BT with high concentration, yield and productivity was achieved by the constructed strain E. coli BT-10 with CCH as substrate.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Engineering strategies for 1,2,4-BT production from CCH by recombinant E. coli. Red crosses meant that these genes were deleted. Blue typefaces meant that these genes (xylB, xylC and xylD from Caulobacter crescentus and kdcA from Lactococcus lactis) were overexpressed. xylB, xylose dehydrogenase coding gene. xylC, xylonolactonase coding gene. xylD, xylonate dehydratase coding gene. kdcA, α-ketoacid decarboxylase coding gene. xylA, xylose isomerase coding gene. yjhG/yagF, xylonate dehydratase coding gene. yjhH/yagE, 2-keto-3-deoxy-xylonate aldolase coding gene. yqhD, NADPH-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase coding gene. ptsG, glucose-specific transporter EIICBGlc coding gene. glK, glucose kinase coding gene. pgi, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase coding gene. zwf, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase coding gene. pfk, 6-phosphofructokinase coding gene. gnd, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase coding gene. EMP, Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway. HMP, Hexose Monophosphate pathway. xynR, regulator of xylonate catabolism coding gene. XylE, xylose transporter. AraFGH, arabinose ABC transporter. XylFGH, xylose ABC transporter. GalP, galactose H+ symporter. PTS, phosphotransferase system

Full size image

Methods

Chemicals

Xylose (99%) and lactose were purchased from Shandong Xitang Biotech Co., Ltd. (Jinan, China). 1,2,4-BT was bought from J&K Scientific Ltd (Beijing, China). Xylonate, 2-keto-3-deoxyxylonate (2-KDX), and 3,4-dihydroxybutyrate (3,4-DHBA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Louis, Missouri, USA). Restriction enzymes were purchased from Thermo Fisher (USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were provided by Beijing Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd (Qingdao, China). T4 DNA ligase and FastPfu DNA polymerase were purchased from Thermo Fisher (USA) and TransGen Biotech (China), respectively. Whey powder containing 77.0% lactose, 11.2% protein, 1.1% fat, 1.9% moisture, and 8.2% ash was purchased from Kuoquan Biotech (Jinan, China). Detoxified CCH containing 118.5 g/L xylose, 11.8 g/L arabinose, 11.5 g/L glucose, 1.4 g/L formate, 0.34 g/L acetate, 0.83 g/L ethanol and 13.5 mg/L furfural was a kindly gift from Shandong Futase Co., Ltd (Dingtao, China). Other chemicals were analytical grade and commercially available.

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli strains were generally cultivated in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl) at 180 rpm and 37 °C. The pTKRED and pCP20 were used for the gene knock-out or knock-in of E. coli W3110 (DE3). Kanamycin, chloramphenicol and spectinomycin were added at a concentration of 50, 40, and 50 μg/mL when necessary.

Table 1 Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work
Full size table

DNA manipulation in E. coli W3110 (DE3)

The primers used are listed in Table S1. Vector isolation, restriction enzyme digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, and other DNA manipulations were carried out using standard protocols as in our previous study [7]. Plasmid was transformed into chemically competent cells by heat shock, and transformants were isolated by plating on antibiotic LB-agar plates. The genes xylB, xylC, xylD and kdcA were synthesized by Tongyong Biosystem Co., Ltd. (Chuzhou, Anhui, China) in our previous study [7,27]. The Red recombination technology was applied for knockout of genes pgi and ptsG, and knock-in of genes xylBC from Caulobacter crescentus in E. coli W3110 (DE3) [26]. The fragment ΔptsG used for knockout of ptsG was obtained by directly amplify the fragment with primers ΔptsG-F1/ΔptsG-R1 from E. coli K12ΔptsG::kan from Coli Genetic Stock Center. The fragment ΔxylA::xylBC used for knock-in of genes xylBC at the position of gene xylA was obtained as follows. Primers ΔxylA::xylBC-F1/ΔxylA::xylBC-R1, ΔxylA::xylBC-F2/ΔxylA::xylBC-R2, ΔxylA::xylBC-F3/ΔxylA::xylBC-R3, and ΔxylA::xylBC-F4/ΔxylA::xylBC-R4 (Additional file 1: Table S1) were used to clone up homologous arm of xylA, the genes of xylBC, kanamycin resistance gene, and down homologous arm of xylA. These four fragments were recombined to form fragment ΔxylA::xylBC. The fragments Δpgi for knockout of pgi, ΔptsG::PT7-xylBC and ΔmgsA::PT7-xylBC for knock-in of genes xylBC at the position of genes ptsG and mgsA were obtained through similar process. The fragments for knockout or knock-in of different genes were transformed into E. coli cells containing pTKRED plasmid by electrotransformation. Positive transformants were selected by relevant antibiotics and confirmed by PCR and subsequent DNA sequencing. Then, the plasmid pCP20 was transformed to eliminate the kanamycin resistance gene kan from chromosome. The two temperature-sensitive plasmids, pTKRED and pCP20, were removed by culture at 42 °C overnight.

Batch fermentations and fed-batch fermentation

Batch fermentation was carried out in 300 mL shake flasks containing 50 mL of LB medium with 10 g/L xylose and 2 g/L lactose at 180 rpm and 37 °C for 24 h. Xylose at the concentration of 10 g/L was added in the medium for fed-batch fermentation in shake flask when necessary. Fed-batch fermentation was also conducted in 1.0-L bioreactor (Infors AG, Bottmingen, Switzerland) with an operating volume of 0.8 L or 7.5-L (B. Braun Biotech International GmbH, Germany) bioreactor with an operating volume of 5 L, respectively. The seed was inoculated directly into a 35 mL test tube containing 5 mL of the LB medium and then was cultivated at 180 rpm in a rotary shaker at 37 °C overnight. The seed culture was prepared in a 500 mL shake-flask containing 100 mL LB medium, and then seed culture was inoculated (10%, v/v) into the fermentation medium. The LB fermentation medium contained 10 g/L lactose, 10 g/L glucose and 30 g/L xylose. Alternatively, the detoxified CCH (25%, v/v) and whey powder (12.99 g/L) were added into the broth to make the xylose concentration at about 30 g/L and lactose concentration at about 10 g/L. Fermentation was performed at 30 °C with an aeration rate of 1.5 vvm and an agitation of 400 rpm. Samples were withdrawn periodically to determine the cell density, concentrations of glucose, xylose, arabinose, lactose, 1,2,4-BT and by-products. When xylose concentration was lower than 10 g/L, xylose or CCH was added to make xylose concentration to 30 g/L. The pH was maintained at 7.0 by automatic addition of 10 M NaOH.

Analytical methods

Cell density was determined by monitoring the absorbance at 600 nm using a visible spectrophotometer (V-5100H, METASH, China). The glucose concentration was enzymatically measured using a bioanalyzer (SBA-40D, Shandong Academy of Sciences, China) after appropriate dilution. The concentrations of xylose, arabinose, xylonate, 2-KDX, 3,4-DHBA, 3,4-DHB, 1,2,4-BT and lactose were analyzed using HPLC system (LC-20AT, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad, USA) linked with an Aminex fast acid analysis column (100 × 7.8 mm, BioRad, USA). The samples withdrawn periodically were centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min and the supernatants were filtered using a 0.22 μm Millipore filter (Millipore Corp, Bedford, MA, USA) before HPLC analysis. The 0.1% formic acid was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min, and the column temperature was 30 °C [27].

Results and discussion

Construction of 1,2,4-butanetriol biosynthesis pathway in E. coli

Biosynthesis of 1,2,4-BT from xylose and arabinose involves five identical enzymic steps including dehydrogenation, hydrolysis, dehydration, decarboxylation and reduction (Fig. 1). In this study, the synthesis pathway for production of 1,2,4-BT from xylose, the most abundant carbohydrate in corn cob, was firstly constructed in E. coli W3110 (DE3) (referred to herein as 0K). E. coli 1K, 3K, 4K and 4KI were four derivative strains of E. coli 0K constructed previously [27]. The xylA encoding xylose isomerase was deleted in E. coli 1K while the yjhH and yagE encoding 2-KDX aldolases were further deleted in E. coli 3K. To enhance the utilization of xylonate, the xynR encoding the regulator of xylonate catabolism was deleted in strain 3K to obtain E. coli 4K. A gene cassette for expressing of xylonate dehydratase XylD (YP_002516235.1) of C. crescentus and α-ketoacid decarboxylase KdcA (WP_095586306.1) of Lactococcus lactis was knocked in E. coli 4K at position of xynR, resulting in E. coli 4KI [27]. Xylose dehydrogenase XylB (YP_002516237.1) and xylonolactonase XylC (YP_002516236.1) from C. crescentus can efficiently catalyze xylose into xylonate. The plasmid pETPtac-xylBC with xylB and xylC genes from C. crescentus was previously constructed and introduced into E. coli for efficient production of xylonate from xylose [7]. In this study, the plasmid pETPtac-xylBC was transformed into E. coli 0K, 1K, 3K, 4K and 4KI, resulting in strains E. coli BT-1, BT-2, BT-3, BT-4 and BT-5, respectively. Expression of xylB and xylC in pETPtac-xylBC is under control of Ptac and lactose inducible. These recombinant E. coli strains were cultivated in LB medium containing 10 g/L xylose and 2 g/L lactose at 37 ℃ and 180 rpm for 24 h. As shown in Fig. 2, E. coli BT-1, BT-2, BT-3, BT-4 and BT-5 with xylB and xylC exhibited obviously xylose utilization and xylonate production. Endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase YqhD in E. coli could reduce 3,4-DHB to 1,2,4-BT [28]. However, only the strain E. coli BT-5, in which the genes xylD and kdcA responsible for 3,4-DHB production from xylonate were knocked in, has the ability for 3,4-DHB production from xylonate. Thus, no accumulation of 1,2,4-BT was observed during culture of E. coli BT-1, BT-2, BT-3, and BT-4. 1,2,4-BT at a concentration of 2.06 g/L and a yield of 0.29 mol/mol xylose was accumulated within 24 h by E. coli BT-5 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Performance of different recombinant E. coli strains in 1,2,4-BT production from xylose. The experiment was carried out in the 300 mL shake flask containing 50 mL LB broth with 10 g/L xylose and 2 g/L lactose at 37 °C and 180 rpm for 24 h. Values are the average ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments)

Full size image

Knockout of ptsG to increase 1,2,4-butanetriol production

Besides xylose and arabinose, glucose which can support E. coli growth is also present in CCH. Thus, E. coli BT-5 was cultured in LB with 5 g/L glucose and 10 g/L xylose where glucose was utilized to support E. coli BT-5 growth and xylose was used for 1,2,4-BT synthesis. When xylose concentration was lower than 5 g/L, 10 g/L xylose was added in the broth. As shown in Fig. 3A, 2.62 g/L 1,2,4-BT was obtained from 18.67 g/L xylose by E. coli BT-5 with a yield of 0.20 mol/mol xylose.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of gene ptsG deletion on production of 1,2,4-BT from xylose. A Time-course of fed-batch fermentation in the 300 mL shake flask by E. coli BT-5 at 180 rpm and 37 °C. B Time-course of fed-batch fermentation in the 300 mL shake flask by E. coli BT-6 at 180 rpm and 37 °C. C Time-course of fed-batch fermentation in 300 mL shake flask by E. coli BT-6 at 180 rpm and 30 °C. Xylose at the concentration of 10 g/L was added in the medium when necessary. Values are the average ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments)

Full size image

E. coli preferentially utilizes glucose in medium containing glucose and other utilizable sugars like xylose and lactose [24]. Knocked out the ptsG encoding the glucose-specific transporter EIICBGlc can eliminate carbon catabolite repression of glucose. Thus, E. coli 5KI was constructed by deleting ptsG in E. coli 4KI and then the plasmid pETPtac-xylBC was transformed, resulting in strain E. coli BT-6. Glucose can also be transported by galactose symporter after deletion of ptsG gene but the glucose utilization rate of the constructed strain E. coli BT-6 decreased due to the knocked out of ptsG (Fig. 3B). The major byproduct of E. coli BT-5 was xylonate (12.30 g/L) (Additional file 1: Figure S1), which can be transformed by lactose induced XylD and KdcA into 3,4-DHB and then reduced to 1,2,4-BT. Expression of xylD and kdcA is under control of PT7 in E. coli BT5 and BT-6 and lactose inducible. Besides xylose utilization, the catabolism of lactose in E. coli is also repressed by glucose due to carbon catabolite repression [7]. Delayed response to induction often occurs during fermentation using lactose as inducer and glucose as carbon source. Although the consumption of xylose was not improved obviously, the inactivation of ptsG could enhance the utilization of lactose by E. coli BT-6 (Fig. 3B) and thus may also increase the expression of xylD and kdcA. As shown in Fig. 3B, 9.80 g/L 1,2,4-BT was obtained by E. coli BT-6 with a yield of 0.77 mol/mol xylose and accumulation of xylonate decreased to 4.14 g/L (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The enhanced production of 1,2,4-BT by E. coli BT-6 may due to the higher expression of xylD and kdcA by higher lactose utilization. The α-ketoacid decarboxylase KdcA used in this study was from L. lactis, whose optimum growth temperature is 30 ℃. The fermentation temperature for 1,2,4-BT production was tentatively adjusted to 30 ℃ and a slightly higher 1,2,4-BT concentration of 10.76 g/L was obtained with a yield of 0.86 mol/mol xylose from 17.67 g/L xylose (Fig. 3C). Thus, the 1,2,4-BT fermentation was conducted at 30 °C in subsequent experiments.

Integration of xylonate synthesis genes into E. coli genome to increase 1,2,4-butanetriol production

Expression of exogenous gene based on plasmid may increase the metabolic burden of recombinant E. coli [29]. Expression of xylB and xylC based on plasmid pETPtac-xylBC may increase the metabolic burden of recombinant E. coli. As shown in Fig. 3B, the relief of carbon catabolite repression through deletion of ptsG enhanced lactose utilization and increased the production of 1,2,4-BT. It was reported that deletion of mgsA, the methylglyoxal synthase coding gene, can also effectively weaken the carbon catabolite repression [30]. Thus, xylB and xylC under the control of PT7 were knocked into the position of ptsG and mgsA in E. coli 5KI genome for simultaneously relieving catabolite repression and expression of key enzymes for 1,2,4-BT production, resulting in E. coli BT-7 and E. coli BT-8, respectively. The endogenous xylose isomerase coding gene xylA is under the control of Pxyl and can be induced by xylose in E. coli [31]. The xylB and xylC were also directly knocked into the position of xylA and under the control of Pxyl in E. coli 5KI, resulting in strain E. coli BT-9 (Fig. 4A). As shown in Fig. 4B, the strain E. coli BT-9 exhibited the best performance in 1,2,4-BT production. 1,2,4-BT at a concentration of 12.85 g/L was obtained from 20.7 g/L xylose with a yield of 0.88 mol/mol xylose in 24 h (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Selection of integration site of xylBC to increase 1,2,4-BT production. A Scheme of the integration mode of xylBC in E. coli BT-7, E. coli BT-8, and E. coli BT-9. B Performance of E. coli BT-7, E. coli BT-8, and E. coli BT-9 in transforming xylose into 1,2,4-BT. The fed-batch fermentation was carried out in 300 mL shake flask at 180 rpm and 30 °C. When xylose concentration was lower than 5 g/L, 10 g/L xylose was added. Values are the average ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments)

Full size image

Fed-batch fermentation of E. coli BT-9 to produce 1,2,4-butanetriol in 1-L bioreactor

Then, fed-batch fermentation was carried out to produce 1,2,4-BT with E. coli BT-9. E. coli BT-9 was cultured in a 1-L bioreactor with 30 g/L xylose, 10 g/L lactose and 10 g/L glucose. Solid xylose was added under non-sterile condition when xylose concentration was lower than 10 g/L. After 48 h fed-batch fermentation, 1,2,4-BT at a concentration of 23.55 g/L was obtained from 46 g/L xylose with a yield of 0.72 mol/mol xylose. (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of pgi deletion on 1,2,4-BT production from xylose. A Time-course of fed-batch fermentation by E. coli BT-9 in 1-L bioreactor. B Time-course of fed-batch fermentation by E. coli BT-10 in 1-L bioreactor. The fed-batch fermentation was conducted in 1-L bioreactor containing 0.8 L LB broth with 30 g/L xylose, 10 g/L glucose and 10 g/L lactose at 400 rpm, 1.5 vvm and 30 °C. Xylose concentration was adjusted to 30 g/L when lower than 10 g/L. The experiments were conducted in triplicate. Two representative time-courses of E. coli BT-9 A and E. coli BT-10 (B) are reported herein

Full size image

Knockout of pgi to strengthen NADPH supply and 1,2,4-butanetriol production

XylB catalyzes xylose into xylonolactone and generate NADH. However, YqhD required for 1,2,4-BT production is NADPH-dependent. Glucose can enter into EMP pathway to produce NADH or enter into pentose phosphate pathway to produce NADPH. Thus, the pgi encoding glucose phosphate isomerase was deleted in E. coli BT-9 to block the EMP pathway and enhance glucose metabolism via the HMP pathway to provide more NADPH required for 1,2,4-BT synthesis. The obtained E. coli strain BT-10 was used for 1,2,4-BT production in 1-L bioreactor. As shown in Fig. 5B, the 1,2,4-BT production of E. coli BT-10 increased to 27.2 g/L with a yield of 0.77 mol/mol xylose. Compared with E. coli BT-9, the accumulation of 3,4-DHB decreased 14.58% in E. coli strain BT-10 (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Then, the fed-batch fermentation of 1,2,4-BT by E. coli BT-10 was conducted in a 7.5-L bioreactor. Both the growth of E. coli BT-10 and the xylose consumption rate increased in the 7.5-L bioreactor, which may due to the improved dissolved oxygen during the enlargement of fermentation volume. As shown in Fig. 6A, 36.63 g/L of 1,2,4-BT was produced from 79 g/L xylose with a productivity of 1.14 g/[L·h] and a yield of 0.66 mol/mol xylose.

Fig. 6
figure 6

1,2,4-BT production through fed-batch fermentation with E. coli BT-10 using xylose or CCH as the substrate. A Time-course of fed-batch fermentation by E. coli BT-10 in 7.5-L bioreactor with xylose as the substrate. The experiment was conducted in 7.5-L bioreactor with 5 L LB broth containing 30 g/L xylose, 10 g/L glucose and 10 g/L lactose at 400 rpm, 1.5 vvm and 30 °C. Xylose concentration was adjusted to 30 g/L when lower than 10 g/L. The experiment was conducted in triplicate. A representative time-course is reported herein. B Time-course of fed-batch fermentation by E. coli BT-10 in 7.5-L bioreactor with CCH as the substrate. The experiment was conducted in 7.5-L bioreactor containing 5 L LB broth with CCH (the final concentration of xylose was adjusted to 30 g/L) and whey powder (the final concentration of lactose was adjusted to 10 g/L) at 400 rpm, 1.5 vvm and 30 °C. Xylose concentration was adjusted to 30 g/L when lower than 10 g/L. The experiment was conducted in triplicate. A representative time-course is reported herein

Full size image

Fed-batch fermentation of 1,2,4-BT with detoxified CCH as the substrate

Finally, CCH was used as the substrate for fed-batch fermentation of 1,2,4-BT by E. coli BT-10 in a 7.5-L bioreactor. To further reduce the cost for 1,2,4-BT production, lactose was replaced by whey powder (lactose concentration was adjusted to 10 g/L) as the inducer of the genes for 1,2,4-BT production. The protein and fat in whey powder can also be utilized by E. coli BT-10 for growth. The biomass of E. coli BT-10 increased in the fermentation system with whey powder (Fig. 6A and B), which may improve the transform of xylose and arabinose in CCH for 1,2,4-BT production. As shown in Fig. 6B, E. coli BT-10 consumed 62 g/L xylose, 6.16 g/L arabinose and 6.4 g/L glucose in CCH within 40 h. 1,2,4-BT at a concentration of 43.4 g/L was obtained with a productivity of 1.09 g/[L·h]. The yield of 1,2,4-BT from xylose and arabinose was 90% of the theoretical value.

Many biotechnological routes have been developed for the fermentative production of 1,2,4-BT. The synthesis of 1,2,4-BT from xylose or arabinose requires relatively few steps and results in low carbon loss, and thus has been intensively investigated in recent years [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,28,32,33,34,35,36]. A series of metabolic strategies such as screening enzymes with high activities, blocking the branch pathways, and enhancing the expression of the key enzymes, have been applied to improve 1,2,4-BT production from xylose or arabinose. CCH containing xylose, arabinose and glucose is an ideal substrate for 1,2,4-BT production. In this work, the encoding genes of XylB, XylC, XylD and KdcA were integrated into the genome of E. coli W3110 (DE3). Besides xylose, xylonolactone and xylonate, XylB, XylC and XylD from C. crescentus are also active on arabinose, arabinolactone and arabinonate, respectively [37]. KdcA from L. lactis catalyzes the decarboxylation of both 2-keto-3-deoxy-xylonate and 2-keto-3-deoxy-arabinonate [38]. Although the catabolic genes for arabinose utilization were not deleted in E. coli BT-10, these four heterologous enzymes and endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase YqhD may efficiently redirect the metabolic flux of arabinose from central metabolism to 1,2,4-BT production (Fig. 1). To eliminate catabolite repression and enhance the supply of NADPH for YqhD catalyzed 1,2,4-BT production with glucose, the ptsG and pgi genes were also deleted in E. coli W3110 (DE3). The final recombinant strain E. coli BT-10 can produce 43.4 g/L 1,2,4-BT from CCH with a productivity of 1.09 g/[L·h]. Compared with other strains constructed for 1,2,4-BT production (Table 2), E. coli BT-10 has significant advantages of high 1,2,4-BT concentration, productivity, yield and efficient utilization of cheap substrate CCH.

Table 2 Comparison of 1,2,4-butanetriol production by different microorganisms
Full size table

Conclusion

In summary, a systematically metabolic engineered strain E. coli BT-10 was constructed to produce 1,2,4-BT. 1,2,4-BT at a concentration of 36.63 g/L and a productivity 1.14 g/[L·h] was produced by E. coli BT-10 with xylose as the substrate. E. coli BT-10 can also use glucose in CCH for growth and transform xylose and arabinose into 1,2,4-BT. 1,2,4-BT of 43.4 g/L was produced from CCH with a productivity of 1.09 g/[L·h]. The process presented here is both a good example for efficient resource utilization of CCH and a promising alternative for industrial 1,2,4-BT production.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

1,2,4-BT:

1,2,4-Butanetriol

CCH:

Corn cob hydrolysate

BTTN:

1,2,4-Butanetriol trinitrate

2-KDX:

2-Keto-3-deoxyxylonate

3,4-DHB:

3,4-Dihydroxybutanal

3,4-DHBA:

3,4-Dihydroxybutyrate

EMP:

Embden-meyerhof-parnas pathways

HMP:

Hexose monophosphate pathway

References

  1. Wakudkar H, Jain S. A holistic overview on corn cob biochar: a mini-review. Waste Manag Res. 2022;40(8):1143–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Islam F, Imran A, Afzaal M, Saeed F, Asghar A, Shahid S, Shams A, Zahra SnM, Biswas S, Aslam MA. Nutritional, functional, and ethno-medical properties of sweet corn cob: a concurrent review. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2023;58(5):2181–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim M, Singhvi MS, Kim BS. Eco-friendly and rapid one-step fermentable sugar production from raw lignocellulosic biomass using enzyme mimicking nanomaterials: A novel cost-effective approach to biofuel production. Chem Eng J. 2023;465: 142879.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou H, Mao Y, Zheng Y, Liu T, Yang Y, Si C, Wang L, Dai L. Complete conversion of xylose-extracted corncob residues to bioplastic in a green and low carbon footprint way. Chem Eng J. 2023;471: 144572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li B, Wang P, Feng Y, Xu X, Zhang Y, Zou X. Bio-refinery of xylose processing wastes for green polymalic acid production and l-malic acid recovery by engineered Aureobasidium pullulans in a non-waste-disposal system. Chem Eng J. 2023;454: 140533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baptista SL, Cunha JT, Romani A, Domingues L. Xylitol production from lignocellulosic whole slurry corn cob by engineered industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2. Bioresour Technol. 2018;267:481–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang YP, Guo ST, Wang YX, Liang XP, Xu P, Gao C, Ma CQ. Production of d-xylonate from corn cob hydrolysate by a metabolically engineered Escherichia coli strain. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7(2):2160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai D, Dong Z, Wang Y, Chen C, Li P, Qin P, Wang Z, Tan T. Biorefinery of corn cob for microbial lipid and bio-ethanol production: an environmental friendly process. Bioresour Technol. 2016;211:677–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Yao P, Zhang S, Feng J, Su H, Liu X, Sheng X, Wu Q, Zhu D, Ma Y. Creating a new benzaldehyde lyase for atom-economic synthesis of chiral 1,2,4-butanetriol and 2-aminobutane-1,4-diol from formaldehyde. Chem Catal. 2023;3(1):100467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu W, Yan Q, Pang A, Chi X, Du X, Xiao H. A DFT study of the unimolecular decomposition of 1,2,4-butanetriol trinitrate. J Mol Model. 2014;20(2):2081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan R, Liu D. Synthesis of cationic lipids from 1,2,4-butanetriol. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40(2):209–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu M, Liu C. Comparative simulation study of chemical synthesis of energetic (R)-1,2,4-butanetriol trinitrate plasticizer. Int J Quantum Chem. 2017;117(16): e25402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanessian S, Ugolini A, Dubé D, Glamyan A. Facile access to (S)-1,2,4-butanetriol and its derivatives. Can J Chem. 2011;62(11):2146–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen X, Xu H, Wang T, Zhang R, Sun X, Yuan Q, Wang J. Rational protein engineering of a ketoacids decarboxylase for efficient production of 1,2,4-butanetriol from arabinose. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2023;16(1):172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Cai Z, Li Y, Zhang Y. Design and construction of a non-natural malate to 1,2,4-BT pathway creates possibility to produce 1,2,4-butanetriol from glucose. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao Q, Wang X, Hu S, Xu N, Jiang M, Ma C, Yang J, Xu S, Chen K, Ouyang P. High-yield production of d-1,2,4-butanetriol from lignocellulose-derived xylose by using a synthetic enzyme cascade in a cell-free system. J Biotechnol. 2019;292:76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Niu W, Molefe MN, Frost JW. Microbial synthesis of the energetic material precursor 1,2,4-BT. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(43):12998–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valdehuesa KNG, Liu H, Ramos KRM, Park SJ, Nisola GM, Lee W, Chung W. Direct bioconversion of d-xylose to 1,2,4-butanetriol in an engineered Escherichia coli. Process Biochem. 2014;49(1):25–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jing P, Cao X, Lu X, Zong H, Zhuge B. Modification of an engineered Escherichia coli by a combined strategy of deleting branch pathway, fine-tuning xylose isomerase expression, and substituting decarboxylase to improve 1,2,4-butanetriol production. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;126(5):547–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yukawa T, Bamba T, Guirimand G, Matsuda M, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Optimization of 1,2,4-butanetriol production from xylose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of NADH/NADPH balance. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118(1):175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bamba T, Yukawa T, Guirimand G, Inokuma K, Sasaki K, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Production of 1,2,4-butanetriol from xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae through Fe metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2019;56:17–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu S, Gao Q, Wang X, Yang J, Xu N, Chen K, Xu S, Ouyang P. Efficient production of d-1,2,4-butanetriol from d-xylose by engineered Escherichia coli whole-cell biocatalysts. Front Chem Sci Eng. 2018;12(4):772–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sutiono S, Zachos I, Paschalidism L, Pick A, Burger J, Sieber V. Biocatalytic Production of 1,2,4-butanetriol beyond a titer of 100 g/L: Boosting by intermediates. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2023;11(17):6592–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan X, Tu S, Lin L, Yang J, Shen H, Wu M. Combination of the CRP mutation and ptsG deletion in Escherichia coli to efficiently synthesize xylitol from corncob hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(5):2039–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jarboe R. YqhD: a broad-substrate range aldehyde reductase with various applications in production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:249–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6640–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang YP, Liu YD, Zhu JN, Xiao D, Xu P, Ma CQ, Gao C, Lu CJ. Coculture of Gluconobacter oxydans and Escherichia coli for 3,4-dihydroxybutyric acid production from xylose. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9(32):10809–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. She D, Wang S, Zong H, Lu X, Zhuge B. Genetic modification of Escherichia coli to improve 1,2,4-butanetriol production from cellulose hydrolysate. Syst Microbiol Biomanufactur. 2023;9:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ow DS, Nissom PM, Philp R, Oh SK, Yap MG. Global transcriptional analysis of metabolic burden due to plasmid maintenance in Escherichia coli DH5α during batch fermentation. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2006;39:391–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yomano LP, York SW, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. Deletion of methylglyoxal synthase gene (mgsA) increased sugar co-metabolism in ethanol-producing Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31:1389–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Song SG, Park C. Organization and regulation of the d-xylose operons in Escherichia coli K-12: XylR acts as a transcriptional activator. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(22):7025–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Xu N, Hu S, Yang J, Gao Q, Xu S, Chen K, Ouyang P. d-1,2,4-butanetriol production from renewable biomass with optimization of synthetic pathway in engineered Escherichia coli. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:406–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma PF, Meng J, Zhou J, Gao HJ. Biosynthesis of d-1,2,4-butanetriol from d-xylose by recombinant Escherichia coli. CIESC J. 2015;66:2620–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cao Y, Niu W, Guo J, Xian M, Liu H. Biotechnological production of 1,2,4-butanetriol: an efficient process to synthesize energetic material precursor from renewable biomass. Sci Rep. 2016;5(1):18149.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun WL, Lu XY, Zong H, Fang HY, Zhu G, Song J. Biosynthesis of d-1,2,4-butanetriol by an engineered Escherichia coli. Microbiol China. 2014;41(10):1948–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zu JS, Xu SW, Lu XY, Zong H, Zhuge B. Construction of a 1,2,4-butanetriol-integrated strain and fermentation of its co-substrate. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 2019;25(4):966–71.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stephens C, Christen B, Fuchs T, Sundaram V, Watanabe K, Jenal U. Genetic analysis of a novel pathway for d-xylose metabolism in Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(5):2181–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang J, Chen Q, Wang X, Chen K, Ouyang P. The biosynthesis of d-1,2,4-butanetriol from d-arabinose with an engineered Escherichia coli. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:2620–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Xiangmei Ren from Core Facilities for Life and Environmental Sciences (State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University) for assistance in HPLC analysis and Chengjia Zhang and Nannan Dong from Core Facilities for Life and Environmental Sciences (State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University) for assistance in microbial fermentation.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970056 and 31970055), the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2106000), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Provincial (ZR2022QC092), State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology Open Projects Fund (M2023-02), and State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology (SKLMTFCP-2023–03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, NO.72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, China

    Ping Li, Mengjiao Wang, Haiyan Di, Xiaoxu Tan, Chao Gao, Chuanjuan Lü & Cuiqing Ma

  2. Bloomage Biotechnology Corporation Limited, 678 Tianchen Street, Jinan, 250101, China

    Ping Li

  3. Shandong Institute of Metrology, Jinan, 250014, China

    Qihang Du

  4. State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, China

    Yipeng Zhang

  5. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Ping Xu

  6. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China

    Tianyi Jiang

Authors
  1. Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengjiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haiyan Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qihang Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yipeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoxu Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chao Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tianyi Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chuanjuan Lü
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cuiqing Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PL: Writing original draft, Investigation, Data curation. MW: Formal analysis, Software, Validation. HD: Software, Validation. QD: Software, Funding acquisition. YZ: Resources. XT: Software, Validation. PX: Software, Supervision. CG: Software, Funding acquisition. TJ: Software, Funding acquisition. CL: Software, Funding acquisition. CM: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review, Funding acquisition. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chuanjuan Lü or Cuiqing Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file1:

Table S1. The primers used in this study. Figure S1. Effect of gene ptsG deletion on byproducts generation during 1,2,4-BT production from xylose. Figure S2. Selection of integration site of xylBC to increase 1,2,4-BT production. Figure S3. Effect of pgi deletion on byproducts generation during 1,2,4-BT production from xylose.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Wang, M., Di, H. et al. Efficient production of 1,2,4-butanetriol from corn cob hydrolysate by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact 23, 49 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12934-024-02317-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12934-024-02317-0

Keywords

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us